Home » Blog » Bailout

Posts Tagged ‘Bailout’

INCREASE YOU COMPANY’S TRUST FACTOR (PART 2)

Trust mishaps don’t just happen with external customers and the public; they also happen internally with employees. A few years ago one major company laid-off a few thousand employees. Rather than meeting with people individually, laying them off with dignity and providing support services, the company had their security guards tell those being laid-off the bad news, gave them their paperwork, watched them clean out their desk, and then escorted the former employees out the door. The employees still working there learned one important lesson that day: Never trust upper management.

Last month, I shared two strategies to increase your company’s trust factor to enhance the bottom line. This month, I would like to share two additional strategies to help foster trust in your organization.

THINK IN TERMS OF THE OTHER PERSON’S PERSPECTIVE.
No matter how hard you try, sometimes mistakes will happen and trust will decrease. But rather than accept the lower level of trust, see this time as an opportunity to raise the bar on trust with those who are feeling less of it. For example, suppose you have a major disagreement with one of your key distributors.

You both think the other is wrong. This is when you need to step up and say to the distributor, “We’ve had a long and trusting relationship with you and we don’t want to lose that. What can we do to make you happy?” The answer you’ll hear will likely be more than fair because the conversation has now shifted from a confrontational to a relational one. Everyone will come out a winner.

SURVEY CUSTOMERS AND EMPLOYEES ABOUT TRUST.
Have employees, business partners, and customers rate you on trust. You could even have them fill out the trust meter for you. With this feedback, you will know where you stand and can make adjustments. All too often, trust is undermined and the company and its leaders are the last to know, and this can be disastrous. If you are the first to know, you can make corrections before it is too late. This also shows everyone that relationships and mutual trust are not just words, they are imperatives.

TRUST PROVIDES A BIG ADVANTAGE IN ANY ECONOMY
Too often, customer service and support are cut back when the economy heads south. People are laid-off with no warning or support. Face-to-face customer meetings are cut back or canceled. But this is a time to do the opposite. When things are bad, relationships become more important! Doing things better stands out more. Becoming a trusted advisor versus a sales person stands out. Going the extra mile is more unique.

When you increase trust, your relationships will deepen and your business will improve.

Increase Your Company’s Trust Factor

With billions of dollars in taxpayer bailout money, how much do you trust the leadership of the banks that, after record losses, gave themselves unprecedented raises? How much do you trust the leaders of Wall Street? How much do you trust our government’s ability to manage the money they have given to the banks or the auto industry? How much do you trust the leaders of the auto industry to do the “right thing” with the bailout money? This growing lack of trust can have serious consequences as we try to reverse the economic meltdown and bring about positive change and growth.

The one thing every business professional should be certain about, regardless of industry, is that the future is all about relationships. And the one thing all relationships need to survive is trust. In fact, trust is the glue that holds the net-enabled knowledge economy together. The more trust you have with someone, the more powerful the relationship. The less trust you have, the weaker the relationship.

In business, trust is something you must earn. You do so by displaying three universal values: honesty, integrity, and delivering on promises. In fact, no matter where you travel around the world and regardless of religion or culture, those three values are the same. Because people worldwide place such a high emphasis on trust, many companies cite “trust” in their list of organizational values. And by nature, most people are indeed trusting of others. But because trust is assumed, many companies have a tendency to implement strategies that undermine trust. They fail to make trust a conscious part of their strategy. Instead, trust stays in the back of their mind, and that’s when problems begin.

For example, call your Telephone Company or Internet Service Provider today and tell them you’re going to cancel your service and go with a different provider. Chances are that in order to keep you as a customer, they’ll respond by offering you a lower rate. Does that make you trust them more? No. In fact, you’ll probably feel that you’ve been getting ripped off all these years and should have gotten that lower price all along. Policies such as these train customers to distrust the company.

Despite their actions, companies that violate trust are not evil. Rather, they’re simply not thinking about trust when they lay out a course of action or outline policies. Therefore, in order to foster trust in your organization, consider the following strategies.

NEVER ASSUME TRUST
Whenever you’re bringing about any change, either internally or externally, create a “trust meter.” Think of this trust meter as an old fashioned gas gauge: On the far left is no trust, and on the far right is full trust. Before you implement any change, ask yourself, “Between us (the company) and the people who will be impacted by this decision or policy, where is trust currently?” Mark it somewhere on your trust meter. Then ask, “If we implement this change in this way, what will happen to that trust?” Mark whether you think trust will go down, stay the same, or increase.

If trust will go down, don’t implement the change in that way. This doesn’t mean don’t enact the change, decision, or policy. It simply means not to do it in the way you’ve outlined. Change how you implement the decision or policy so trust stays where it is. And if anyone on your team can come up with a way to get the trust meter to increase when implementing the change, reward that person openly, because you want that behavior repeated. Remember, when you raise the bar on trust, your organization will thrive.

OFFER MORE VALUE TO REWARD LOYALTY
As you decide what policies and changes your company will implement, think in terms of adding value rather than giving something for nothing. For example, one newspaper publisher sent out a $190 yearly renewal notice to customers. Those customers who didn’t renew by the deadline received a phone call about the renewal. The newspaper employee offered the customer a deeply discounted renewal rate of $90. This is “something for nothing” mentality, because now the customer sees less value in the product (and feels ripped off for paying the higher renewal price in the past).

A better strategy would be to offer the customer a few additional months of newspaper delivery for no extra charge. So now instead of getting twelve months of newspaper delivery for a certain price, the customer gets fifteen months of service for that same price. When you think in terms of rewarding loyalty with more value rather than a lower price, people feel that the company is giving them a genuine “thank you.” They feel appreciated (something everyone wants to feel) and will actually want to keep doing business with you. Therefore, pinpoint what your customers will perceive as added value and make that a part of your policy change.

Next month, I will share two additional strategies that will allow you to bring about change faster and more effectively, and improve your business.

Solving The Real Problem

Last month, I discussed the importance of making sure that the problem you are trying to solve is the correct problem. As we all painfully know, the media has been filled with stories about whether the government should spend billions of dollars to bail the big three automakers out of their financial problems. The problem for GM, Chrysler, and soon Ford, is that they are running out of money and may be forced into bankruptcy.

The problem for the U.S. economy and our government is that if we don’t spend billions to bailout the automakers, millions of autoworkers, not to mention car dealers and auto parts suppliers, will lose their jobs. That will cause more unemployment, less tax revenue to our troubled states, more foreclosures, and the list goes on and on.

THE REAL PROBLEM
This billion-dollar bailout solution our government has been considering does not solve the real problem! The real problem is that people are not buying cars. If people were buying cars, the automakers would have the money they need to continue to operate. Giving billions of dollars to the automakers will not dramatically increase car sales. They will still have to close plants and layoff millions of workers because their cars are not selling.

Why have car sales for the big three declined so dramatically? After all, other manufacturers (such as Toyota) have not asked for a bailout, they have been hiring and planning to open new plants.

For 2007 and the majority of 2008, the answer to poor sales was high fuel costs and a lack of fuel-efficient vehicles to choose from. As the credit crisis hit and the word recession entered the news, declining fuel costs were not enough to bring buyers back to the big three. And for people wanting a new car, getting a loan has now become a major new barrier for all automakers. Giving the big three money will not solve the credit crisis, it won’t make loans easier to get, it won’t give them economical, fuel-efficient cars to sell for quite some time, and it will not make people feel the economy has improved.

If the government did feel it was important to save the millions of jobs the auto industry represents, we should ask ourselves: What would it take to increase car sales?

One answer would be for the government to provide a $5,000 to $10,000 subsidy, depending on the price of the car, to anyone wanting to buy a new car. This would stimulate car sales, keep autoworkers at their jobs, stop plants from being closed, provide needed revenue to the manufacturers, increase confidence in lending money to the manufacturers, and keep the car dealers and parts suppliers employed. In addition, this would make car loans smaller and easier to obtain.

Another answer would be to require banks that are receiving Federal bail out money to use a portion of that money to make loans for qualified buyers. We have already found out that giving banks billions of dollars with no requirements will not ease the credit crisis.

These are just a few ideas. The key is to make sure we are solving the correct problem.

THINKING BEFORE DOING

A few days ago, I met with the top executives of a Fortune 100 company. (These executives were very busy as you might imagine.) It was not easy for them to devote an entire day to step back and examine what I call “The New Big Picture” and the rapidly emerging risks and opportunities associated with seeing it.

I started out by asking them if they thought the big three auto executives and all of their direct reports had been very busy the past five years. They all laughed as they agreed. Being too busy to think strategically about future risk and opportunity is often at the center of our biggest problems.

NOT THINKING

It seems the big three auto executives weren’t thinking when they all flew separately to Washington in private jets. Driving to Washington in each of their company’s most fuel-efficient car might have sent more of a “we’re working on it” message.

Not having a detailed spending plan for the billions of dollars they were requesting was another example of not thinking. Having a detailed plan as to how they would spend the money would have at the very least provided confidence.

Not connecting the rapid increase in automobile ownership in both China and India to the resulting increase in the demand and price of fuel was another amazing mistake. The irony in this becomes clear when you consider all of them were actually selling cars in those markets and were excited about the unprecedented increase in demand for cars. More cars mean more fuel, who would have thought of that?

The point is that being busy and not thinking can get you into big trouble.

During my meeting, one of the executives posed the following question. “If our government was to give the automakers the money, what do you think they should do with it?”

I suggested that everyone was focused on the wrong problem. The reason for the bailout was to prevent massive layoffs. The reason people aren’t buying the big three’s cars isn’t because the big three is low on cash. It is because the majority of the cars they make are gas hogs and many of the people who want to buy a car can’t get loans because of the financial crisis. Giving the big three money won’t solve the financial crisis and it will take years to redesign and build fuel-efficient cars. In other words, they will still have to lay off masses of people. It would be better for the government to give anyone who wants to buy a car a subsidy reducing the price of the car by up to $10,000, less for lower end cars. This would keep cars selling and workers working.

I know you are all very busy doing a lot of things as we face a growing recession. Let’s make sure we take the time to think about the risks and the opportunities, the present and the future before we do too much.



Reaction to Burrus

Daniel Burrus' Strategic Insights Blog


Trends for 2012

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player



Watch Dan Burrus Videos

The Foresight Package




Visit our download center

Visit our News and Media section

See why clients rave about Burrus Research
Back to top